Leadership & Career

Educational leadership, community building, and professional growth for educators.

Moving Beyond the Baseline: What ACT Scores Don’t Tell You

This started as a conversation in class.

Students had just received their ACT scores. Naturally, the comparisons started. Who scored higher, who needed to retake, what schools require what numbers. Then the bigger questions came up. What does this mean for college? Am I behind? Am I ahead?

That moment is familiar. It happens every year. But it also opens the door to a conversation that most students don’t hear early enough.

There is something called the academic threshold.

At a certain point, GPA and test scores stop being a competitive advantage. They become the baseline.

The Myth of the Perfect Student

For a long time, the formula felt clear. Get a 4.0. Take AP or Dual Enrollment classes. Join National Honor Society. Stay involved. Check the boxes.

That model still matters, but it does not separate you anymore.

At competitive universities and for major scholarships, most applicants already meet that standard. High GPA, strong scores, multiple activities. That is not what gets someone noticed. It is what gets someone considered.

If your entire story is built on being “well-rounded,” you start to blend in with everyone else who did the same thing.

What Actually Stands Out

Students don’t need more activities. They need depth.

I tell my students to stop thinking about being well-rounded and start thinking about being focused. You need something that shows who you are when no one is telling you what to do.

There are a few ways this shows up.

1. Competing and Proving Skill

It is one thing to be in a club. It is another to compete and perform at a high level.

Journalism, speech, UIL academics, robotics. These spaces test your ability in real conditions. They show that what you know holds up outside your classroom.

That matters.

2. Building Something on Your Own

The strongest students I’ve worked with don’t wait for assignments.

They build something.

An app. A podcast. A small business. A publication. A system that solves a problem on campus. These projects show initiative. They show that you can take an idea and follow it through.

That matters more than participation.

3. Creating Real Impact

Service hours alone don’t tell a story.

What changed because you were there?

Did you organize something? Improve a system? Help more people than before? Lead something that continued after you left?

Impact is measurable. It shows up in results.

4. Developing a Real Skill

Students who stand out can point to something specific.

They can design, code, write, speak, edit, translate, produce. They can show work. They can show growth. Sometimes they even have certifications to back it up.

They are not just students. They are becoming practitioners.

Changing the Story

This is where the shift happens.

A student who says, “I have a 4.0 and I was in student council,” sounds like everyone else.

A student who says, “I used my role in student council to redesign how we communicate with students, and I also compete in journalism at the state level,” tells a different story.

Same school. Same opportunities. Different level of ownership.

The Question That Matters

When students show me their resume or start talking about college applications, I ask them one question.

So what?

You are in a club. So what did you do?

You held a position. So what changed because of you?

You volunteered. So what impact did you make?

If there is no clear answer, that is where the work needs to happen.

Final Thought

ACT scores matter. GPA matters. They open doors.

But they are not the reason you walk through them.

The students who stand out are the ones who use high school to produce, compete, and create impact. They don’t wait to be told what to do. They build something, improve something, or lead something.

Don’t just be a student completing tasks.

Become someone who does the work in a way that leaves a mark.

📝 Reflecting on Learning to Teach: How a Journal Assignment Helps Future Educators Connect Theory, Practice, and Growth

In my Education and Training and Education Practicum courses, one of the most impactful assignments I’ve implemented is the Reflection Journal: Understanding Your Learning Journey. This 1–2 page assignment encourages students—many of whom are preparing for careers in teaching or educational support—to explore their own learning habits, preferences, and experiences through the lens of educational psychology and learning theory.

While it may look like a simple writing task, the learning that comes from it is powerful. Through structured reflection, students develop a stronger awareness of themselves as learners, gain insight into pedagogy, and begin forming the foundational thinking necessary for becoming reflective practitioners.


🎯 Purpose and Pedagogical Intent

At its core, this assignment is designed to meet multiple learning goals:

• Build metacognitive awareness by helping students analyze their own learning habits

• Deepen understanding of learning theories like Behaviorism, Constructivism, Cognitivism, and Social Learning Theory

• Strengthen critical thinking and academic writing skills

• Encourage students to form actionable learning goals and personalized strategies for growth

• Promote the application of theory to practice—a critical skill for any future educator

These outcomes are especially aligned with the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) for Education and Training courses.


📚 TEKS Connections

This assignment directly supports the following TEKS objectives for Education and Training and Practicum in Education and Training:

• §130.142(c)(3)(A): The student analyzes the historical, theoretical, and philosophical foundations of education.

• §130.142(c)(3)(C): The student applies learning theories to instructional practices.

• §130.144(c)(1)(F): The student demonstrates the use of self-assessment and reflection to improve performance.

• §130.144(c)(2)(B): The student applies strategies to address individual learning needs and preferences.

By integrating these objectives into a single, student-centered assignment, learners are not just memorizing definitions—they’re applying complex theories to real-world learning experiences, which enhances both retention and relevance.


✍️ Assignment Breakdown: Promoting Deeper Understanding

The Reflection Journal guides students through four major areas of inquiry:

1. Self-Analysis as a Learner

Students begin by identifying their learning preferences (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) and evaluating how their current study habits either align or conflict with research-based learning theories. This helps them understand that learning is not one-size-fits-all, and that effective instruction starts with understanding yourself.

2. Connecting Theory to Practice

Next, students select two learning theories (e.g., Social Learning Theory and Constructivism) and apply them to personal experiences—like how they studied for a test or worked on a group project. This application shows students how theories function outside the textbook and provides a strong foundation for lesson planning and learner differentiation in the future.

3. Growth and Improvement

Students identify two areas they’d like to improve as learners and craft an action plan using learning theory to support behavior change. This not only builds accountability, but also helps them experience firsthand how intentional planning leads to improved performance.

4. Broader Implications

Finally, students explore how this knowledge can apply to their academic, professional, and social development. They consider how theory informs collaboration, communication, and classroom culture—essential insights for anyone pursuing a future in education.


💡 Why This Matters in a CTE Setting

As educators preparing educators, our goal isn’t just to teach skills—it’s to help future teachers think like teachers. That means encouraging reflection, analysis, and an ability to connect pedagogy to practice. This assignment helps students do exactly that.

Additionally, reflective writing develops TELPAS-aligned skills in English learners and supports cross-curricular goals by:

• Encouraging structured writing with academic vocabulary

• Promoting complex thinking and explanation

• Reinforcing connections between CTE content and core subjects like ELAR and psychology


📌 Final Thoughts

Students often finish this assignment with eye-opening realizations—about how they learn, why they struggle, and how they can succeed. More importantly, they begin to recognize how those same realizations can shape their approach to working with others in the classroom.

This is what makes the Reflection Journal so powerful: It’s more than an assignment—it’s a moment of transformation.

Whether students pursue education, human services, psychology, or any career where understanding people matters, this kind of reflective practice lays the groundwork for lifelong learning and professional growth.


Want to try this in your own classroom? Reach out and I’ll share the assignment template, rubric, and a student reflection sample!

#EducationAndTraining #PracticumInEducation #CTE #LearningTheories #ReflectiveTeaching #Metacognition #TEKSAligned #FutureEducators #CareerReady #CriticalThinking #StudentVoice

Building Personal Relationships in the Classroom: A Communication Perspective Rooted in Freirean Ideology

Building personal relationships in the classroom does more than just improve student behavior or classroom management. It is crucial to student engagement and success. Research shows that students who feel connected to their teachers are more likely to participate actively, feel confident in their learning abilities, and experience academic growth (Pianta et al., 2003). But what does it take to build those relationships?

In this blog post, we’ll explore how educators can develop strong personal connections with their students through a communication theory lens, while also leveraging the power of social capital and Paulo Freire’s ideology of empowerment. Personal relationships in the classroom are not just about creating a positive atmosphere; they are about empowering students to take ownership of their learning and creating an equitable space where all voices are heard (Freire, 1970).

Communication as the Foundation for Relationship Building

Communication is at the heart of relationship-building in any context, and the classroom is no exception. One valuable lens through which we can view this process is Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT), which suggests that people adjust their communication styles to either converge with or diverge from those they are interacting with (Giles & Coupland, 1991). In the classroom, this means that teachers can build rapport by adapting their communication to meet the needs of diverse learners.

Key Strategies for Educators:

  • Active Listening: Listening actively demonstrates respect and signals to students that their voices matter, which helps in building strong relationships (Rogers, 1959).
  • Nonverbal Communication: Nonverbal cues such as body language, eye contact, and facial expressions are key to creating a welcoming atmosphere for students (Mehrabian, 1972).
  • Dialogue: Freire (1970) emphasized the importance of dialogue, where both teacher and student engage in mutual learning. This process fosters equality in communication, moving away from the traditional top-down instructional model.

Practical Application:

Educators can use open-ended questions to invite students into a deeper dialogue. Questions like “What do you think about…?” or “How does this relate to your experiences?” can encourage students to share personal insights, leading to a more inclusive and interactive classroom environment (Vygotsky, 1978).

The Role of Social Capital in Education

Social capital refers to the networks and relationships that provide individuals with access to resources, opportunities, and support. In education, social capital plays a crucial role in shaping students’ academic outcomes (Bourdieu, 1986; Coleman, 1988). Teachers who build strong personal relationships with students effectively increase their social capital, giving them access to help, guidance, and opportunities for collaboration.

Connection to the Classroom:

In the classroom, teacher-student relationships act as a key source of social capital. When students trust their teachers and feel supported, they are more likely to take risks in their learning and engage with their peers (Putnam, 2000).

Example:

Consider a student who feels confident enough to ask for help because they trust their teacher. This trust, built through personal connection, allows the student to access the resources they need to succeed. Without that personal relationship, the student might struggle in silence, missing out on important growth opportunities (Dika & Singh, 2002).

Empowering Learners through Personal Connection

Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1970) posits that education should be a practice of liberation, where students are empowered to critically engage with the world around them. Freire argued that traditional educational models often oppress students by treating them as passive recipients of knowledge. Instead, he advocated for horizontal dialogue, where both teacher and student engage in mutual learning.

Building Relationships Through Dialogue:

When teachers develop personal relationships with students, they create space for this kind of mutual learning. Personal connections allow teachers to understand their students’ unique backgrounds and experiences, empowering them to bring these lived experiences into the classroom. This shifts the power dynamic and enables students to take more ownership of their education (Freire, 1970).

Practical Strategies for Building Personal Relationships

Building personal relationships with students requires intentional effort, but it is achievable with strategies that promote dialogue and mutual respect.

Relational Communication:

  • Personalized Feedback: Providing feedback that acknowledges each student’s unique contributions builds a relationship grounded in respect (Hattie & Timperley, 2007).
  • Regular Check-Ins: Whether through brief one-on-one conversations or anonymous surveys, checking in with students regularly can help build stronger relationships by addressing both their emotional and academic needs (Fisher et al., 2011).
  • Collaborative Goal Setting: Allowing students to participate in setting their own learning goals fosters autonomy and strengthens their relationship with the teacher (Ryan & Deci, 2000).

Student-Centered Approaches:

  • Project-Based Learning: This method allows students to engage with topics they are passionate about, which increases their sense of ownership and connection to the material (Krajcik & Blumenfeld, 2006).
  • Peer Collaboration: Encouraging students to work together on projects builds a sense of community and strengthens relational dynamics (Johnson & Johnson, 2009).

Culturally Responsive Teaching:

By integrating students’ cultural backgrounds into lessons, teachers show respect for their identities and create a more inclusive environment. Culturally responsive teaching deepens personal connections and enhances social capital (Ladson-Billings, 1995).

The Long-Term Impact of Personal Relationships on Learning

Developing personal relationships with students not only enhances academic performance but also fosters their social-emotional development. When students feel connected to their teachers, they become more resilient in the face of challenges, take academic risks, and persist in their studies (Hamre & Pianta, 2001).

Freire’s Legacy:

Personal relationships in the classroom, grounded in effective communication, the building of social capital, and Freire’s ideology of empowerment, are essential to creating an equitable and transformative educational environment. By fostering trust, dialogue, and mutual respect, educators can empower students to take ownership of their learning and engage fully in their education.

As educators, reflect on your own communication practices. How are you fostering personal connections with your students? What strategies can you implement to create more equitable, student-centered spaces where all learners feel empowered?

Exploring Classical Learning Theories in Education

In our Instructional Practices class, students are diving into foundational learning theories to better understand the philosophy behind effective teaching. We’re working through Chapter 1, Section 1 of Learning Theories Simplified by Bob Bates, focusing on nine classical learning theories ranging from Socrates’ emphasis on reflection to Freire’s concept of critical consciousness. This assignment encourages students to explore how great thinkers have shaped educational approaches, while also making connections to modern teaching practices.

Assignment Breakdown and Objectives

The assignment is designed to help students become familiar with classical learning theories and apply them to real classroom scenarios. Here’s how it’s structured:

  1. Theory Selection and Research: Students select one theory, such as Dewey’s Pragmatism or Aristotle’s Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, and conduct in-depth research on the concepts, historical context, and applications of their chosen theory. This week-long research phase allows students to build a thorough understanding of key philosophical ideas in education.
  2. Peer Teaching Presentations: Each student prepares a presentation to teach their chosen theory to the class. These presentations are interactive and include an overview of the theory, real-world applications, and a brief discussion or activity. This peer teaching aspect builds public speaking skills and fosters a collaborative learning environment where students can engage with diverse perspectives on education.
  3. Theory-Based Lesson Plan Creation: Students create a mini-lesson plan incorporating their selected theory, complete with Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) alignment, learning objectives, and an activity grounded in theoretical principles. This element reinforces the importance of aligning instructional design with pedagogical philosophy.

How We’re Applying These Theories in Class

To bring these theories to life, the class structure includes a mix of direct instruction, storytelling, and reflective discussions. Each day, students check in to share their progress, ask questions, and collaborate on ideas. This consistent feedback loop enables students to connect their research with practical classroom experiences.

As a core part of the course, students complete two weekly classroom observations, followed by reflective journaling. These observations are key to understanding the dynamics of classroom instruction and identifying examples of how these classical theories are applied in real time.

Why This Assignment Matters

Studying classical learning theories in depth helps students develop a critical understanding of educational philosophy, a skill essential for future educators. By blending historical insights with practical application, students can see how abstract ideas like Socrates’ method of questioning or Dewey’s focus on experience play a tangible role in shaping modern classrooms.

This assignment not only promotes a deeper appreciation for the field of education but also cultivates essential skills in research, lesson planning, and peer instruction.

Assessing student reflections requires a focus on both the content of the reflection and the depth of thought, while recognizing that reflection is inherently subjective. Here are some key ways to effectively assess student reflections:

1. Use a Rubric Focused on Depth and Relevance

A rubric provides clear criteria for evaluating student reflections. Here are some elements that can be included in a reflection rubric:

  • Insightfulness and Depth of Analysis: Look for evidence that students are critically analyzing their experiences, connecting them to learning theories or specific goals, and demonstrating a deeper understanding of the material.
  • Specific Examples and Details: High-quality reflections often include concrete examples from classroom observations or personal experiences, helping to ground their thoughts in real-world context.
  • Connection to Theory or Learning Goals: Assess how well students connect their reflections to relevant theories, learning outcomes, or educational practices discussed in class.
  • Clarity and Coherence: Reflections should be well-organized and clearly express the student’s thoughts and insights.

2. Provide Reflective Prompts for Guidance

Prompting students with specific questions can help them dig deeper. For example, you might ask:

  • “What surprised you most about the classroom experience, and why?”
  • “How does this observation connect to [specific learning theory]?”
  • “What would you do differently if you were the teacher in this situation?”

Using these prompts as part of the rubric can guide students and standardize responses.

3. Focus on Growth Over Time

Reflections are tools for growth, so track how students’ reflections deepen over time. Look for changes in how they analyze situations, connect experiences to theory, and self-assess.

4. Encourage Self-Assessment and Peer Feedback

Including self-assessment or peer feedback as part of the reflective process can be a powerful way to encourage students to assess their own growth. You can have students review their earlier reflections to assess progress, or use peer reviews for additional insights.

5. Provide Constructive, Narrative Feedback

Instead of only assigning a score, offer narrative feedback on student reflections. Highlight where the student showed deep insight, asked valuable questions, or made strong connections to theory, and offer suggestions for how they might reflect more deeply in future assignments.

By assessing reflections with these strategies, you create a supportive framework that values personal insight and encourages critical thinking, guiding students toward more thoughtful and meaningful self-assessment.